Logs for the RingoJS IRC channel,
as logged by ringostarr.
[08:18] <jirka> hi, is anyone here? For a quick question?
[13:38] <robi42> fyi: http://github.com/blog/699-making-github-more-open-git-backed-wikis (hannesw_)
[13:51] <robi42> zumbrunn earl: no ringobot :$
[15:05] <zumbrunn> robi42: thanks for the ping
[15:05] <zumbrunn> hadn't noticed
[15:05] * zumbrunn goes looking for the ringobot
[19:25] <oravecz> would it make sense to file a feature request for evaluating functions in skins?
[19:25] <oravecz> i.e. <% myObject.myFunc() %>
[19:36] <earl> i don't think so, that's what macros are there fore
[19:36] <earl> for*
[19:36] <earl> it would make sense to file a bug re the nested expansion issue for user-defined macros you mentioned a few days ago
[19:38] <earl> i.e. to get <% foo bar="<% baz %>" %> to work properly
[21:44] <hannesw> oberhamsi thanks for your jsdoc improvements
[21:44] <oberhamsi> hannesw, sure was bugging me
[21:44] <hannesw> :)
[21:45] <hannesw> so i think we can release 0.6 next week
[21:45] <oberhamsi> i'm still not happy with adding a repository switcher... is changing the deploy on ringojs.org out of the question?
[21:45] <oberhamsi> yey! 0.6.. i'm still reading meeting log
[21:45] <hannesw> hey, also no more index.html!
[21:46] <hannesw> no, i'm fine with changing the setup on ringojs.org
[21:46] <hannesw> whatever is easier
[21:47] <oberhamsi> yes, the reason for index.html was that that would make the links identical in file:// and http:// but not worth it
[21:47] <hannesw> right
[21:47] <oberhamsi> if we manage to deploy a static version (maybe only for the releases) we could show the detailedModuleList (with module descriptions)
[21:47] <hannesw> one minor thing - i think the filter sidebar (whatever you want to call it) should use "/" as module name separator
[21:47] <hannesw> instead of "."
[21:48] <hannesw> oberhamsi deploying static version sounds like a good idea to me
[21:48] <hannesw> not much sense in doing everything dynamically
[22:01] <earl> mhm, static docs for past releases sounds sensible
[22:06] <oberhamsi> i was also hoping we could avoid adding the multi repository stuff back to jsdoc that way