2010-05-28

[09:05] <oberhamsi> my 2cents re: monkey patching: i want unique()

[09:07] <oberhamsi> i find others in core/array more obscure.. like partition(fn) or all the static set methods.

[10:12] <gmosx> hey

[14:08] <gmosx> hannesw: hey?

[14:11] <gmosx> anyone alive? ;-)

[14:13] <robi42> hey gmosx, here's someone alive :)

[14:13] <gmosx> a quick question: how can I add a package in a command line ringojs app?

[14:14] <robi42> i think there's a switch to bin/ringo to specify additional package paths

[14:15] <gmosx> doesn't ringo take the packages.json file's 'dependencies' key into account?

[14:17] <robi42> hm, i think package dependencies resolution's currently work in progress :)

[14:21] <gmosx> hmm.. perhaps that's why the module loader is so fast ;-) ;-) I don't mind, it's a great tradeoff

[14:36] <hannesw> gmosx what are you trying to do?

[14:36] <hannesw> using a package in a command line app should just work

[14:36] <hannesw> if it's installed

[14:36] <gmosx> What is the preferred method to add a packages to a command line Ringo

[14:36] <gmosx> app? In webapps I just put the package into WEB-INF/packages, what is

[14:36] <gmosx> the equivalent for command line apps?

[14:36] <hannesw> ringojs/packages

[14:36] <gmosx> I don't want to install this globally, ie in the Ringo dir, I only want to have it in my app

[14:36] <hannesw> install via ringo-admin install

[14:37] <hannesw> that's not currently supported, but wouldn't be hard to implement

[14:37] <gmosx> ok...

[14:38] <gmosx> will this slow down the module loader when implemented?

[14:38] <hannesw> no, i don't think so

[14:38] <gmosx> ok

[14:38] <hannesw> i'm already running with ~20 packages installed without any slowdown

[14:39] <gmosx> should I add just a symlink in ringojs/packages?

[14:39] <hannesw> you can if you want

[14:39] <gmosx> ok

[14:39] <gmosx> let me try this

[14:39] <hannesw> i use symlinks for the packages i work on

[14:51] <gmosx> btw, the subprocess.system bug (demon does not exit) still persists...

[17:29] <mschwartz> hannesw: you about?

[17:58] <mschwartz> hannesw: you about?